Every major U.S. business college now accepts both the GRE and the GMAT. There are still a few exceptions (at the time of writing this article, BYU and the full-time Haas MBA programe not accepting GRE scores) but those are exceptions.
According to a 2012 survey conducted by Kaplan, only 16% of MBA applicants have even considered using the GRE for their MBA applications, and far fewer have actually applied to business schools with a GRE score. As a result, MBA programs really aren’t able to give us a clear idea of the average GRE scores for its admitted students, since so few admits actually take the GRE.
Are business schools willing to accept GRE takers as Students?
Few people at ETS have created a nifty GRE-GMAT score converter if you’re using the pre-2011 GRE scoring system, a 700 on the GMAT would have been roughly equivalent to a GRE composite score between 1400 and 1450, depending on the exact breakdown of your quant and verbal scores. If you’re using the new GRE scoring system (on a wildly inconvenient scale from 260 to 340), you’ll need to score somewhere between 323 and 328 to earn the equivalent of a 700 on the GMAT.
The trouble is, it’s not clear whether MBA admissions committees put much faith in the score converter. Everybody in the MBA world knows how to interpret GMAT scores, but some educational institutes not 100% comfortable selecting MBA students based on GRE scores, even with the score converter. GRE simply doesn’t have that sort of track record in the MBA world.
And that makes perfect sense, considering the lack of data on MBA applicants, students, and graduates who have taken the GRE. Decades of GMAT validity studies tell us that the GMAT is an excellent predictor of MBA students’ performance during their first year of business.
Why GRE attracting students?
GMAT is tough and GRE is much easier and attractive as comprarison to GMAT.GRE dosnt have data sufficiency and sentence correction section.Instead it have gramer vocabulary and quntative comparisons related questions.
In GRE you can traverse back and change your previous answers.
GRE is cheaper then GMAT.
The bigger problem is that the GRE is unlikely to offer you any particular advantage over the GMAT. Both the test are almost similar but if you still believe that you’ll do better on GRE than on the GMAT, then there’s no reason to hesitate.
What are the differences between the two tests? Although I think that most people will score similarly on the two tests.
The GRE includes two 30-minute writing assessments, instead of the GMAT’s combo meal of one AWA and one 30-minute Integrated Reasoning exercise.
On the quant side, the GRE lacks the data sufficiency that all GMAT test-takers (*cough*) dearly love; instead, the GRE includes a less-tricky question type called quantitative comparisons.
The GRE also includes some numeric entry questions that require you to come up with an actual number yourself. And the GRE also gives you data analysis questions, which aren’t terribly common on the quant section of the GMAT. So if you hate data sufficiency and love data analysis, you might be happier taking the GRE.
The GRE also offers a simple on-screen calculator, but I’d argue that it really doesn’t help all that much—the numbers are rarely cumbersome on either exam, especially if you’re well-trained in the art of finding intelligent quant shortcuts.
On the verbal sections, the differences between the GRE and the GMAT are substantial. Both exams include some sort of reading comprehension and critical reasoning questions, but the GRE has no sentence correction questions. Instead, you’ll face some vocabulary-heavy text completion and sentence equivalence questions. So if you have a strong vocabulary and hate GMAT sentence correction, then maybe the GRE is for you.
Structurally, there are also some major differences between the GMAT and the GRE. The GRE has several shorter sections and only one extended break, roughly two hours into the test. I would argue that the GRE feels like running wind sprints:
The GMAT, of course, includes one 75-minute quant section and one 75-minute verbal section. The total amount of test-taking pain is similar, but the heart of the GMAT consists of two long, painful marathons, instead of a set of shorter sprints.
And now for the most important difference between the two tests: the GMAT is question-level adaptive, while the GRE is section-level adaptive. If you get a few consecutive questions correct on the GMAT, you’re likely to see tougher questions almost immediately. But the GRE only “adapts” between sections. If you do really well on the first quant section, then your second quant section will be extremely difficult.
In some ways, that’s absolutely wonderful: on the GRE, each 20-question section is “fixed” once you start the section, which means that you can go back and review the questions that you’ve already completed within that section.
GRE is now section-level adaptive, not question-level adaptive. That means that you can flag questions within any given section, and come back to them later. The GRE even includes a handy little review screen, so that you can see exactly which questions you’ve flagged or skipped.
GRE starts with two 30-minute essays, followed by one non-threatening quant section and one fairly straightforward verbal section. Then you take a 10-minute break.
GRE is preferred if you are better at vocabulary than grammar.
GRE is preferred if you are comfortable with statistics and algebra and geometry
If these two characteristics apply to you, then maybe the GRE is worth a look. After all, almost every major MBA program now accepts the GRE. If you’re not convinced that you’ll perform substantially better on the GRE, then stick with the GMAT.